As the Zelizer notes, taboos occur facing sex having hire
Sweden, based in north Europe, hosts ten mil anybody, making it the quintessential populated country inside Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden) as well as in brand new European Nordic Area (Scandinavia and Finland and you will Iceland). Originating in the new late 1990’s, Sweden turned the global commander regarding the fight prostitution, putting some nation common in the literary works and you can discussion about sex work.
Contained in this section, We explain how the Swedish model provides diffused throughout the world. I give an explanation for laws (that’s now 2 decades dated) and also the feminist thought that served the first legislation. However outline the three many years ot fieldwork that we transmitted out in Sweden. step one questioned twelve trick informants (public professionals, activists, a counselor, and good sexologist) in two of your own about three major Swedish metropolitan areas (Stockholm and you may Malmo), and in Oslo escorts Rome (Norway) and Helsinki (Finland) examine various countries and you can expertise. The conclusion summarizes part of the performance ot my personal browse.
It is important to understand the environment in Sweden with respect to research on pros- titution/sex performs. This issue is so sensitive that it seems impossible for the average person to have a neutral approach to it. Everyone must stand in favor of or against the legislation. And the words used to frame the discussions matter a great deal. The Swedish law uses the terms prostitution and prostitute, not sex work and sex worker. The government and those who support the legislation use the word prostitution, while those who wish to overturn the legislation use the term sex staff member. For example, Swedish government institutions, such as local authorities and health services providers, use the word prostitution, but the two Swedish associations that fight tor the rights of the country’s sex workers (Fuckforbundet and Rose Alliance; see Figures 31.1 and 31.2) use the term sex works. 1 learned from my fieldwork that using the correct words with the people who live and work in Sweden is important. Indeed, some social workers or activists refused to talk with me because 1 used the “wrong” word with them; because the legislation is so controversial, few people believe that you are a neutral researcher who wants to study prostitution or sex work from an academic point of view. Attempting to
Figure 29.1 Individuals with purple umbrellas (symbolic of the latest sex workers’ liberties way) to the Fuckforbundet floats when you look at the EuroPride Procession into the Stockholm to the .
To know the consequences of your Swedish laws and regulations towards the existence as well as on the task out-of male sex pros, 1 questioned twenty five men sex specialists who work within the Sweden
be as neutral as possible, some researchers and social workers have used the term sex to own settlement. Unfortunately, the phrase just sounds awkward to those who hear it and who want to know your position on the issue.
To maintain a neutral position, in this chapter 1 use both terms, in alphabetical order with a slash in between: prostitution /sex works or prostitute/sex employee. Before exploring the details of the Swedish legislation, it is important to understand the feminists thought that has framed the prostitution/sex work debate.
Contour 29.2 This new Fuckforbundet floats away from a street-height check within the EuroPride Parade in the Stockholm with the . Sex workers and you may allies on floats monitor its support having sex workers’ rights when you look at the Sweden.
Due to space limitations, I offer two key elements of the debate: the different ideas regarding prostitution/sex work (as presented by Zelizer, 2005) and feminist thought on this topic (Scou- lar, 2004). The aim of Zelizer s book, The acquisition off Closeness, is to analyze “the relationship between everyday practices and legal disputes when it comes to intimate economic interactions” (p. 1). It is commonly believed that “intimacy corrupts economy and the economy corrupts intimacy. Yet . . . people often mingle economic activity with intimacy. The two often sustain each other” (p. 1).